Since faith is one, it must be professed in all its purity and integrity". Pope Francis/Pope Benedict

Sunday, 26 June 2016

The Bishop of Rome commits calumny against Christ and His Church

Francis, the Bishop of Rome has either lost his mind or is an evil malefactor. There is no alternative. Today, during the inflight Press Conference, Francis had this to say:

"[The Church] shouldn’t just apologize to a gay [sic] person whom it has offended,” he said.

“It should ask forgiveness also from the poor, from exploited women, from children exploited as laborers. It has to ask forgiveness for having blessed so many weapons … Christians should ask forgiveness for not having accompanied so many persons, many families.”

How can a Pope say such things? Is he not thinking? Is he unaware of the incredible damage he has created? The enemies of Christ will seize upon these remarks that claim that the Church has amongst other things abused the poor, exploited women... In fact, he and his fellow clergy have committed these sins by not teaching what Christ taught with clarity and unambiguity. 

Much has already been written on the alleged need for an "apology" to those who engage in sodomy and other unnatural vice. We wish, in this post, to draw attention to Francis' outrageous undermining of Catholic teaching on Holy Matrimony, as expressed by St. Paul. We wish to address the issue of "exploited women". How can a Catholic, let alone a Pope claim that the Church is responsible for the exploitation of women and should apologize? This is calumny against Christ and His Apostles and the Church Fathers. 

St. Paul wrote in Colossians 3:18:  

Wives, be in subjection to your husbands, as is fitting in the Lord. Husbands, love your wives, and be not bitter against them.

St. John Chrysostom, in his 10th Homily on Colossians (in a work which Francis obviously has not read) wrote the following commentary: 

 Ver. 18. Wives, be in subjection to your husbands, as is fitting in the Lord.

That is, be subject for God's sake, because this adorns you, he says, not them. For I mean not that subjection which is due to a master, nor yet that alone which is of nature, but that for God's sake.

Ver. 19. Husbands, love your wives, and be not bitter against them.

See how again he has exhorted to reciprocity. As in the other case he enjoins fear and love, so also does he here. For it is possible for one who loves even, to be bitter. What he says then is this. Fight not; for nothing is more bitter than this fighting, when it takes place on the part of the husband toward the wife. For the fightings which happen between beloved persons, these are bitter; and he shows that it arises from great bitterness, when, says he, any one is at variance with his own member. To love therefore is the husband's part, to yield pertains to the other side. If then each one contributes his own part, all stands firm. From being loved, the wife too becomes loving; and from her being submissive, the husband becomes yielding.


So much indeed for the exploitation of women. The Church should apologize to women for defending them? For proclaiming the beautiful doctrine of Holy Matrimony which raised women up from being chattel in the ancient world? That the teaching of Christ and His Church are wrong?

Perhaps it is Popes and churchmen who have failed Christ and His Church? Stop blaming the Faithful! They should apologize for their grave failings and for this profane litany that Francis has concocted.

If they want to apologize, perhaps they should apologize for the priests who have raped little boys and girls, and to the Faithful who have paid the exorbitant recompense of billions of dollars that could have been used for the poor that we hear so much about coming from Rome. Apologize for the billions wasted on their sins and crimes! Yes, we are waiting for an apology to the sexually abused and the poor. 

A late friend of ours once said: "no dogma, no dollars". If the Church is not going to teach dogma and doctrine, no money!

Co-written by Barona and Sofia (of

Collapse in belief in the Real Presence is why we are going through the crisis of Holy Communion for adulterers

I have been arguing for years that the primary cause of the crisis in the Church is an Eucharistic crisis. Disbelief in the Real Presence has real consequences. The heresy of the neumatic presence of Christ has been worming its way through the Church for decades. 

Consider why we are even having this "debate" involving the distribution of Holy Communion to those who live in habitual sin, adultery.  

This debate is only possible because of a massive collapse in belief in the Real Presence. 

The following is but one example of this denial of the Real Presence. 

No further commentary is necessary. The denial of the Real Presence is the grave sin that strikes at the heart of the Catholic Church:

Jesus blessed:
The priest prays the Eucharistic prayer of blessing over the bread and wine (over us gathered) and through the power of the Spirit, changes them (us) into the body and blood of Jesus Christ - a wonderful gift to offer to the Father.

Contrast the above abuse and evil to true respect for the Holy Eucharist and the Real Presence: 

Saturday, 25 June 2016

The Secret about Holy Matrimony and Sacred Sex. The Soul and the Body are One

The first Martyr for the sanctity of Holy Matrimony, St John the Baptist was not married. Yet, he gave his life in its' defense. We must look at why the Baptist knew that Holy Matrimony must be defended, even unto death. 

Marriage is a sacred sacrament; it is a reflection of the Blessed Trinity. Holy Matrimony reflects the the union between Christ and His Church in a mystical manner, and between a man and a woman it a sacred Union, which is spiritual and physical. 

Given that the human person is soul and matter; indeed, the person is ensouled matter, the Union between a man and a woman therefore is sacred sex, because the soul and the body constitute the entire person, which is a Temple of the Holy Spirit. Just as the Church obeys Christ, so the woman obeys her husband; just as Christ delivered Himself up for the Church, so too, the husband must deliver himself up for and to his wife.  

It is a tragedy that so many churchmen fail to teach and preach the sacredness of Holy Matrimony; a tragedy that so many couples rather than undertaking the Sacrament soberly and with dignity, degrade it to a nauseating display of superficial sentimentality. 

The recent Synod of the Family, and the Apostolic Exhortation Amoris Laetitia, rather than confirm Catholics in the sanctity of Holy Matrimony and its unity and indivisibility, only continued the marital crisis by continuing and perpetuating confusion. The recent remarks of the Pope that men and women who are not married, but are living in habitual sin, yet are in the state of Grace, is not true. If the Pope meant that they lived as brother and sister, he would be correct. But he did not say this; therefore he did not want us to interpret his remarks as a couple living celibately. 

Truly, a cloud of darkness has descended upon Rome with the Pope and so many bishops and priests, sadly followed by innumerable men and women, failing to grasp the absolute sanctity and unicity of the Union of a man and woman in Holy Matrimony. 

Archbishop Fulton Sheen was right: it takes three to make love. 

Wednesday, 22 June 2016

Sts. John Fisher and Thomas More: Defenders of Holy Matrimony

In that horrifying 16th century, when King Henry VIII, tore England from the Rock of Peter, corrupting and turning the Church in England into the "church" of England, Catholics would do well to recall the witness to Holy Matrimony given by St. John Fisher and St. Thomas More. 

Here we have one bishop (out of about 50 bishops. My times have not changed. In other words 98% of the English and Welsh hierarchy went along with the destroyer of the Church in England), and one layman (who gave up the temptations of riches and honour, and then his life to be loyal to Christ). 

These two great saints are a splendid example for the clergy and laity of our day. A remarkable example to to resist the evil clamor coming from the very men, the very churchmen, that a few years ago we would think unthinkable. Especially unthinkable would it be to consider that the very Pope, the man sitting on the Throne of Peter would utter such evil when he spoke last week that those living in grave habitual sin receive grace from God. 

If this be so, then the struggle between the Catholic Church and the despotic Tudor Tyrant was all for naught. Surely, the Pope of the day could have come to some arrangement with the lustful Monarch and winked at his "irregular situation" and even informed the King that he was receiving grace from God. 

No, it could not be so. The Church must be faithful to Christ and His beautiful teaching about Holy Matrimony. Fisher and More understood well the meaning of the Union betwixt Christ and His Church, and how it was reflected in the Union between a man and a woman; she truly obeying him, he delivering himself up for her. 

There can be no doubt that in our selfish world, the resistance to obey on the part of the woman, and the resistance to deliver himself up on the part of the man has removed the "holy" from Matrimony and, is seen  by the near universal manifestations in parish  weddings of the turning of something holy,  sober, dignified into a sad confusion about "partnership", "equality", coupled with the most foolish sentimentalism, superficiality and so on. 

This false understanding of Holy Matrimony, this surrender by churchmen to the world has precipitated an avalanche of profaned marriages. It should come as no surprise that so many marriages collapse when they are not founded on the teachings of Jesus Christ. When the very day of Nuptials is a disgraceful circus and call to  lust, rather than a quiet, sober religious ceremony. How many recall that that Louis and Zellie Martin - now canonized - formalized their marriage in a ultra discrete and private ceremony just before midnight? If only more Catholics would follow their example! 

The mockery of Holy Matrimony by society has not been strongly opposed by churchmen. To the contrary, they have enabled this denigration and mockery. We all witnessed and are feeling the effects of the disastrous Synod of the Family, and the cunningly composed Amoris Laetitia which deliberately injected confusion so as to play safe from explicit accusations of heresy. Nonetheless, the effect is the same as open heresy. 

Amoris Laetitia and the mad ravings of dissident churchmen is the compromise that Henry VIII was seeking. Amoris Laetitia contains within it the necessary tools that would have availed the corrupt King and a weak and vacillating Pope to come to an "agreement". An agreement, had it been made, that would have cast the teachings of Christ into outer darkness.  

Let us therefore without bending the knee to the god of compromise, without burning even one grain of sand to the idol of adultery or fornication reject all and any profanation of the Sacrament of Holy Matrimony. If something is proposed to us, be it from an "angel from heaven", or a Pope, bishop or priest that is not in accord with the unchangeable teachings of Christ and His Church - let him be anathema. The Pope may still be our father, but just as a father remains the head of the family, the children are under no obligation to obey when asked to sin. 

May the prayers of St. John Fisher and St. Thomas More, as well as all those English and Welsh martyrs for the Faith convert the heart of Pope Francis and the adulterists and homosexualists within the Church; to move them to repentance and to once again teaching the doctrine of Holy Matrimony without compromise. 

Saturday, 18 June 2016

Jesuit Hubris: doctrine must evolve to fit with pastoral practice

Antonio Spadaro S.J., a very close advisor and confidante of Pope Francis has just tweeted happily an article by the Jesuit heretic Thomas P Rausch that doctrine must change to match pastoral evolution. The boldness of these liars and deceivers is such that they are now dropping any pretext of the monstrous lie that "doctrine changes when pastoral contexts shift and new insights emerge..." to openly admit that doctrine must be re-formulated to fit pastoral practices. Vox Cantoris accurately predicted that these men always had one thing in mind, the changing of doctrine. 

Now, we are informed in the neo-Modernist La Civilta Cattolica, that the "evolution of doctrine is not only possible, but necessary..." in response to pastoral situations. The Jesuit "De Suisse Romande" is emphatic: Amoris Laetitia opens the door for the divorced and "remarried" - in other words, ADULTERERS - to receive Holy Communion. 

De Suisse Romande gives a highly favourable  review by the arch-Modernist Jesuit, Rausch, who proposes that paragraph 305 of Amoris Laetitia opens the way to "recontextualize" doctrine in the service of the "pastoral mission of the Church". 

Such errors are not new, but as part of the doctrine of the Modernists were formally condemned by Pope St. Pius X. The holy Pope wrote: 

These errors are being daily spread among the faithful. Lest they captivate the faithful's minds and corrupt the purity of their faith, His Holiness, Pius X, by Divine Providence, Pope, has decided that the chief errors should be noted and condemned by the Office of this Holy Roman and Universal Inquisition.

Therefore, after a very diligent investigation and consultation with the Reverend Consultors, the Most Eminent and Reverend Lord Cardinals, the General Inquisitors in matters of faith and morals have judged the following propositions to be condemned and proscribed. In fact, by this general decree, they are condemned and proscribed.

Condemned Propositions by Pius X in Lamentabili Sane: 

58. Truth is no more immutable than man himself, since it evolved with him, in him, and through him.

59. Christ did not teach a determined body of doctrine applicable to all times and all men, but rather inaugurated a religious movement adapted or to be adapted to different times and places.

63. The Church shows that she is incapable of effectively maintaining evangelical ethics since she obstinately clings to immutable doctrines which cannot be reconciled with modern progress.

Wednesday, 15 June 2016

Fr. Edward Beck is a malefactor and deceiver: apostate priest rejects teaching on the intrinsic evil of homosexual acts

Homosexualist propagandist, Fr. Edward Beck 
Writing in the neo-Modernist online rag, Crux (sponsored by the Knights of Columbus), CNN religion commentator, Fr. Edward Beck, de facto scoffed off the Catechism of the Catholic Church rejected Catholic teaching on the sinfulness of homosexual acts. In rejecting the teachings of Christ and replacing it with moral relativism, Beck articulated a position that there is no objective moral truths, and that each person may decide what is right and wrong. One may ask Beck: is this only applicable to those to engage in the sin of Sodom; or, logically should we also extend this to all sins? Perhaps the pedophile priests also think they have done nothing wrong and they should be given a pass? Perhaps the rapist or abortionist also feels he has "nothing for which to apologize or atone". Beck reflects the total corruption of the Passionist Order that he belongs to. 

Beck wrote: 
This man is an evil malefactor, a Judas priest. He is liar and a deceiver and should leave the priesthood. 

Monday, 13 June 2016

Homosexualist Malefactor, Bishop Robert Lynch of St. Petersburg, Florida, accuses Catholics of targeting homosexuals

Neo-Modernist and homosexualist Bishop Robert Lynch of the Diocese of St. Petersburg, Florida (who has been reviewed in a generally positive light by the extreme-pro-homosexual militant group, New Way Ministries) wrote the following. The bishop has forgotten the spiritual works of mercy: to instruct the ignorant, to admonish sinners...

We read of no call for the conversion of homosexuals, no fraternal admonishment. Instead we have homosexualist language, the insinuation that the Catholic Faith "targets" people who engage in grave sexual sins, the confusing of Being and Acting (forgetting that what a person is, is different than what a person does). Yes, all men are created in God's image and likeness, but  through sin, stain and darken this image. Not ONCE did Bishop Lynch use the word "SIN". One may ask the deluded bishops: perhaps the Pulse "nightclub" was for chaste homosexuals who belonged to Courage? If it was, perhaps Bishop Lynch should let us know, so we can support their families. 

The bishop speaks of the "faithful departed" who were slain. From what I understand the "faithful' of the Catholic do not frequent homosexual bath houses to commit perverted sexual acts. Perhaps Lynch should do two things: identify these "faithful departed", and explain to Catholics why he has refused to admonish sinners who engage in unnatural sexual behaviour. 

Today I write with a heavy heart arising from the tragedy which occurred in the early morning hours yesterday at a Gay, Lesbian, Transgender night club in Orlando, our neighbor to the east... 

Second, sadly it is religion, including our own, which targets, mostly verbally, and also often breeds contempt for gays, lesbians and transgender people. Attacks today on LGBT men and women often plant the seed of contempt, then hatred, which can ultimately lead to violence. Those women and men who were mowed down early yesterday morning were all made in the image and likeness of God.

...Singling out people for victimization because of their religion, their sexual orientation, their nationality must be offensive to God’s ears.

....may the souls of those faithful departed who met their God early Sunday morning rest in peace.

Friday, 10 June 2016

Has the Vatican really endorsed Salt and Light TV - the channel that praised the arch-heretic, Gregory Baum?

Thomas Rosica, CSB., at an event in Vancouver, BC., stated the following regarding Salt and Light: 

"The Vatican has told me this is an extremely important way of evangelizing; a discreet, but constant, evangelization".

Fr. Rosica should provide us with the name of the churchman or churchmen who stated this. If the Roman authorities did indeed state this, were they aware of the same Fr. Rosica's praise for the arch-heretic and ex-priest, Gregory Baum. The lauding of Baum, hardly constitutes evangelization, discreet or otherwise. 

"... you have been for me and continue to be a real model of hope... you remain a faithful, deeply devoted Catholic; you love Jesus, the Church, the Eucharist".  

Fr. Thomas Rosica, addressing ex-priest/dissident theologian, Professor Gregory Baum. 

Many Catholics, having heard the scandalous interview with Baum will find it hard to believe that Rome approves of Salt and Light TV. On the other hand, perhaps the Modernist infiltration is so deep, so extensive, that indeed it may not be too difficult to find a wolf in sheep's clothing who will endorse as Catholic a media channel that praises Baum.